Hello,
i have a 1.5 Tb seagate disk (NTFS format)
when i check with crystal disk info it notices me reallocate sector count (12/36)
i want to use this hdd for a short time more (And to copy data to other disk ) ,and i have some problems which i'm not sure about ,please help :
1. when i copying the data from this disk to other hdd ,
I wonder is it needed to isolate/mark the bad sector (without formatting/recreating partition the disk ), sothat we can protect the bad data copied/writed (in my case the reallocate sector count has not reached thresold, is it needed ?)
2. is there anyway to know if the data is on the bad sector - when copying ,accessing ? (is there any error noticed ? )
3. i read some similar topic and found HDAT2 and windows check disk tools ,but i'm not sure if them can isolate/mark the bad sector permanently
(such as when we format the disk,is the marked bad sector still isolated/marked ? (not included new bad sectors appear after scanning)
if using windows check disk tool ,should we use which way ?
1. use tool=> option =>check disk
2 .or use CHKDSK [drive letter] /F /R (i don't know if '/f/r' it's correct in my case ,please tell me which i should type in this case for best result
4. please tell me which program can isolate/mark the bad sector faster (or if you know any better tool ,please tell me)
Thank you very much
i have a 1.5 Tb seagate disk (NTFS format)
when i check with crystal disk info it notices me reallocate sector count (12/36)
i want to use this hdd for a short time more (And to copy data to other disk ) ,and i have some problems which i'm not sure about ,please help :
1. when i copying the data from this disk to other hdd ,
I wonder is it needed to isolate/mark the bad sector (without formatting/recreating partition the disk ), sothat we can protect the bad data copied/writed (in my case the reallocate sector count has not reached thresold, is it needed ?)
2. is there anyway to know if the data is on the bad sector - when copying ,accessing ? (is there any error noticed ? )
3. i read some similar topic and found HDAT2 and windows check disk tools ,but i'm not sure if them can isolate/mark the bad sector permanently
(such as when we format the disk,is the marked bad sector still isolated/marked ? (not included new bad sectors appear after scanning)
if using windows check disk tool ,should we use which way ?
1. use tool=> option =>check disk
2 .or use CHKDSK [drive letter] /F /R (i don't know if '/f/r' it's correct in my case ,please tell me which i should type in this case for best result
4. please tell me which program can isolate/mark the bad sector faster (or if you know any better tool ,please tell me)
Thank you very much
วิธีซ่อมแซมฮาร์ดดิสก์ที่เกิด Bad Sector ด้วยซอฟท์แวร์ HDD Regenerator ที่ว่านี่ จะใช้ในกรณีที่ตัวฮาร์ดดิสก์ยังคงใช้งานได้อยู่นะครับ ถ้าเป็นกรณีที่. Then I ran HDAT2 'detect bad sectors', it found 0 errors. So I ran the 'powerful test READ/WRITE/READ/COMPARE' (which is more or less the same thing as SpinRite level 5) and it also found 0 errors on the whole hard drive.
Hi,
Question: how do I erase/reset/reflash S.M.A.R.T.'s data on bad sectors?
The story so far:
I have a 4-year old Toshiba MK3255GSX Hard Drive with some ~50 bad blocks pending reallocation. These are mostly located in the first 75 gigabytes (sectors ~250~18000000-something). My idea is to repartition the HDD, leaving the first 75 gigabytes unallocated and allocate a new NTFS partition in the remaining 'good' parts of the disk. This was already done. I have no data to recover.
The problem is S.M.A.R.T.'s 'Reallocated_Sector_Ct' && 'Current_Pending_Sector'. I know the drive does automatically reallocate bad sectors and can only reallocate so many of these. But since it has already reallocated all it could reallocate, any new bad blocks on the new NTFS partition will be left un-reallocated, which is unacceptable.
But since I intend to leave the bad sectors in an non-partitioned part of the disk (the first 75 gb), I don't want S.M.A.R.T. to bother with these.
So, I want some guidance to run a procedure, be it reflashing the HDD, or any clever S.M.A.R.T. (re-)configuration or something else (I don't know how to accomplish this) to reset/free the reallocated sectors and start over with the remaining parts of the disk.
Do you know how can it be done?
Which tools are likely to be useful to reset SMART?
Is it likely that SMART will dumbly spent all reallocation space reallocating again the bad blocks from the non-partitioned space, leaving the partitioned space vulnerable to bad blocks once again?
Thanks for your consideration and input.
P.S.: smartctl -a /dev/sda output:
Question: how do I erase/reset/reflash S.M.A.R.T.'s data on bad sectors?
The story so far:
I have a 4-year old Toshiba MK3255GSX Hard Drive with some ~50 bad blocks pending reallocation. These are mostly located in the first 75 gigabytes (sectors ~250~18000000-something). My idea is to repartition the HDD, leaving the first 75 gigabytes unallocated and allocate a new NTFS partition in the remaining 'good' parts of the disk. This was already done. I have no data to recover.
The problem is S.M.A.R.T.'s 'Reallocated_Sector_Ct' && 'Current_Pending_Sector'. I know the drive does automatically reallocate bad sectors and can only reallocate so many of these. But since it has already reallocated all it could reallocate, any new bad blocks on the new NTFS partition will be left un-reallocated, which is unacceptable.
But since I intend to leave the bad sectors in an non-partitioned part of the disk (the first 75 gb), I don't want S.M.A.R.T. to bother with these.
So, I want some guidance to run a procedure, be it reflashing the HDD, or any clever S.M.A.R.T. (re-)configuration or something else (I don't know how to accomplish this) to reset/free the reallocated sectors and start over with the remaining parts of the disk.
Do you know how can it be done?
Which tools are likely to be useful to reset SMART?
Is it likely that SMART will dumbly spent all reallocation space reallocating again the bad blocks from the non-partitioned space, leaving the partitioned space vulnerable to bad blocks once again?
Thanks for your consideration and input.
P.S.: smartctl -a /dev/sda output: